Wednesday, February 01, 2012


Eu fui um dos que gostou do filme Rede Social sobre a criação do Facebook (vi duas vezes), que gira à volta de uma disputa e arbitragem jurídica, e nos oferece o relato e ambiente de criatividade informal e descomplexada (e ainda assim com regras) em (certas) universidades americanas e talvez trazendo à luz uma nova geração e forma de estar, dando origem aos novos ambientes de empresa que reconhecemos na Google e outros. Parece um pouco a emergência e vingança e a subida do jovem-adolescente contra o jovem-gravata já formatado pela máquina.

Jovens-adolescentes que acordam abrir uma empresa onde o financiador [Adam D'Angelo's] tem apenas 30% (creio) e o criador [Zuckerberg] sem cheta o restante (imagine-se por cá...). Vemos também o célebre almoço de encontro com a irrequieto Sean Parket (fundador da Napster, Plaxo e Causes) onde o "The" cai. Na verdade sabemos que isto já é historia hoje e mais será história amanhã.

Isto só para introduzir a troca de chat publicada pela BusinessInsider (uma excelente fonte, óptimas apresentações e chamadas de atenção) entre Zuckerberg e Adam D'Angelo's (a secção de comentário é de ler):

Zuckerberg: So you know how I'm making that dating site
Zuckerberg: I wonder how similar that is to the Facebook thing
Zuckerberg: Because they're probably going to be released around the same time
Zuckerberg: Unless I fuck the dating site people over and quit on them right before I told them I'd have it done.
D'Angelo: haha
Zuckerberg: Like I don't think people would sign up for the facebook thing if they knew it was for dating
Zuckerberg: and I think people are skeptical about joining dating things too.
Zuckerberg: But the guy doing the dating thing is going to promote it pretty well.
Zuckerberg: I wonder what the ideal solution is.
Zuckerberg: I think the Facebook thing by itself would draw many people, unless it were released at the same time as the dating thing.
Zuckerberg: In which case both things would cancel each other out and nothing would win. Any ideas? Like is there a good way to consolidate the two.
D'Angelo: We could make it into a whole network like a friendster. haha. Stanford has something like that internally
Zuckerberg: Well I was thinking of doing that for the facebook. The only thing that's different about theirs is that you like request dates with people or connections with the facebook you don't do that via the system.
D'Angelo: Yeah
Zuckerberg: I also hate the fact that I'm doing it for other people haha. Like I hate working under other people. I feel like the right thing to do is finish the facebook and wait until the last day before I'm supposed to have their thing ready and then be like "look yours isn't as good as this so if you want to join mine you can…otherwise I can help you with yours later." Or do you think that's too dick?
D'Angelo: I think you should just ditch them
Zuckerberg: The thing is they have a programmer who could finish their thing and they have money to pour into advertising and stuff. Oh wait I have money too. My friend who wants to sponsor this is head of the investment society. Apparently insider trading isn't illegal in Brazil so he's rich lol.
D'Angelo: lol

There are two historically significant notes about this conversation:

It seems to be the moment when Zuckerberg decides not to work for somebody else, and to strike out on his own to build what would become Facebook. It's D'Angelo, not Zuckerberg, who seems to suggest "We could make it into a whole network like a friendster."

In the months following his conversation with D'Angelo, Zuckerberg—along with a little bit of help from some Harvard friends, Eduardo Saverin and Dustin Moskovitz—built Facebook (then called TheFacebook), and watched it grow very popular very quickly.

By the next summer, Zuckerberg and pals moved to California and began working on Facebook full-time. By late July, Facebook had almost reached 1 million users, just 7 months after launching.

But despite that early success, a surprising instant message conversation between Mark Zuckerberg and a confidant on July 26, 2004—about who will foot legal bills in the event that Facebook were ever to be sued—reveals that Facebook was not his main priority at the time.

Confidant: Well you should recover the shares you need to recover legal fees.
Zuckerberg: I won't pay the legal fees
Zuckerberg: The company that buys us will haha
Confidant: Cool hopefully that'll be soon so you can move on and just work on what you want to
Zuckerberg: Well it just needs to propel Wirehog
Confidant: So you have gotten responses to your national recognition?
Zuckerberg: Responses from whom?
Zuckerberg: Some more VCs. Still talking to Google and Friendster.

What's enlightening about this conversation:

Even as a million people found themselves addicted to Facebook, Zuckerberg wasn't sure yet that it would end up being worth his time. To him, Facebook "just need[ed] to propel Wirehog," which has since been described as a file-sharing service. How close Google came to owning Facebook—probably for a price approximately $99,990,000,000 lower than what Facebook will IPO for in just a few months.

1 comment:

Sérgio said...

Gostou tanto que nem sabe que o filme se chama The Social Network...