Cisão no Trumpismo?

Duvido, mas....

Trump’s Populist Schism Over Syria, por Walter Russell Mead (Wall Street Journal - quem não tiver uma assinatura, talvez seja melhor abrir em "janela privada):

The conservative opposition to conventional American foreign policy is anything but monolithic. One group of critics continues the Jeffersonian tradition of preserving American liberties at home by minimizing American involvement abroad. Figures like Sen. Rand Paul and his father, former Rep. Ron Paul, speak to this side of the populist coalition. Jeffersonians are skeptical of international institutions and alliances as well as American interventions to protect human rights abroad. They oppose big defense budgets and extensive military deployments and see no reason for an anti-Russia foreign policy. Many believe that Israel seeks to drag the U.S. into Middle East struggles that Washington would do better to avoid. Sen. Paul was quick to announce his support for President Trump’s Syria decision.

The other, Jacksonian wing of conservative populism shares the Jeffersonian suspicion of multilateralism and humanitarian interventions, but is more supportive of the American military and of maintaining America’s reputation for standing by allies. Jacksonians are hawkish about China, Russia and Iran and favor a strong relationship with Israel. This tendency in American politics is represented by figures like Sen. Tom Cotton, a U.S. Army veteran who served in both Afghanistan and Iraq and has criticized Mr. Trump’s Syria decision.

Digo que "duvido" porque suponho que mesmo os "jacksonianos" não se irão incomodar muito com a retirada da Síria - sim, eles não são pacifistas, mas também não são "internacionalistas-humanitários", logo a partir do momento em que quem eles considera o inimigo (o jihadismo islâmico) aparentemente foi derrotado, também não sentirão grande motivação em manter a participação norte-americana numa guerra em que agora o único objetivo seria proteger guerrilheiros de esquerda contra Ancara e Damasco.