O austro-libertarian académico que escreveu o livro Defending the Undefendable (pdf), fazendo a defesa de
I. Sexual . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1
1. The Prostitute . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3
2. The Pimp . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9
3. The Male Chauvinist Pig . . . . . . . . . . . .13
II. Medical . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .25
4. The Drug Pusher . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .27
5. The Drug Addict . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .33
III. Free Speech . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .39
6. The Blackmailer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .41
7. The Slanderer and Libeler . . . . . . . . . . . .47
8. The Denier of Academic Freedom . . . . .51
9. The Advertiser . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .57
10. The Person Who Yells “Fire!” in a
Crowded Theater . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .69
IV. Outlaw . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .73
11. The Gypsy Cab Driver . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .75
12. The Ticket Scalper . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .83
13. The Dishonest Cop . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .91
V. Financial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .97
14. The (Nongovernment) Counterfeiter . .99
15. The Miser . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .111
16. The Inheritor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .117
17. The Moneylender . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .121
18. The Noncontributor to Charity . . . . . .129
VI. Business and Trade . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .137
19. The Curmudgeon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .139
20. The Slumlord . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .147
21. The Ghetto Merchant . . . . . . . . . . . . . .155
22. The Speculator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .165
23. The Importer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .169
24. The Middleman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .179
25. The Profiteer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .185
VII. Ecology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .197
26. The Stripminer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .199
27. The Litterer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .205
28. The Wastemakers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .213
VIII. Labor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .221
29. The Fat Capitalist-Pig Employer . . . . .223
30. The Scab . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .233
31. The Rate Buster . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .237
32. The Employer of Child Labor . . . . . . .243
Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .253
Via o próprio , reuniu as referências de tudo o que escreveu sobre assunto: I am quoted in the New Yorker magazine on David Letterman and his blackmail case:
http://www.newyorker.com/talk/2009/10/19/091019ta_talk_widdicombe
If you want to see my publications on blackmail, here they are:
Block, Walter. 2009. “Reply to Matt Mortellaro on “Block’s Paradox”: causation, responsibility, libertarian law, entrapment, threats and blackmail,” Libertarian Papers; http://libertarianpapers.org/2009/block-33-reply-to-matt-mortellaro-on-blocks-paradox/
Block, Walter, Stephan Kinsella and Roy Whitehead. 2006. “The duty to defend advertising injuries caused by junk faxes: an analysis of privacy, spam, detection and blackmail.” Whittier Law Review, Vol., 27, No. 4, pp. 925-949
Block, Walter. 2005. “Liberdade de Experssao, Discurso, Libelo, Difamacao, Chantagem, Incitamento.” Cultura Do Trabalho, vol. 9; ed., Lars Knorr. Porto Alegre, Brasil: Instituto de Estudos Empresariais
Block, Walter. 2002-2003. “Berman on Blackmail: Taking Motives Fervently,” Florida State University Business Review, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 57-114; http://www.law.fsu.edu/current_students/organizations/businessreview/vol3/block.pdf
Block, Walter. 2002. “Blackmail,” in Levenson, David, ed., Encyclopedia of Crime and Punishment, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishers, 2002, pp. 118-120.
Block, Walter. 2001. “The Logic of the Argument in Behalf of Legalizing Blackmail,” Bracton Law Journal, Vol. 33, pp. 56-80; http://www.walterblock.com/publications/legalizing_blackmail.pdf
Block, Walter and Gary Anderson. 2001. “Blackmail, Extortion and Exchange,” New York Law School Law Review, Vol. 44, No. 3-4, pp. 541-561; http://www.walterblock.com/publications/blackmail_extortion_exchange.pdf
Block, Walter. 2001. “Toward a Libertarian Theory of Blackmail,” Journal of Libertarian Studies, Vol. 15, No. 2, Winter, pp. 55-88; http://www.mises.org/journals/jls/15_2/15_2_2.pdf
Block, Walter. 2000. “Blackmail is Private Justice,” University of British Columbia Law Review, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 11-37
Block, Walter. 2000. “Reply to Wexler: Libertarianism, Blackmail and Decency,” University of British Columbia Law Review, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 49-53; http://www.walterblock.com/publications/reply_to_wexler.pdf
Block, Walter. 2000. “Threats, Blackmail, Extortion and Robbery And Other Bad Things,” University of Tulsa Law Journal, Vol. 35, No. 2, Winter, pp. 333-351; http://141.164.133.3/faculty/Block/Blockarticles/threatsblackmailextortionandrobbery.htm
Block, Walter. Stephan Kinsella and Hans-Hermann Hoppe. 2000. “The Second Paradox of Blackmail,” Business Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 10, No. 3, July, pp. 593-622; http://www.walterblock.com/publications/second_paradox.pdf; http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdf?vid=149&hid=116&sid=781cb0b0-a517-47c5-9874-ee43ba5138d5%40sessionmgr3
Block, Walter. 2000. “The Legalization of Blackmail: A Reply to Professor Gordon,” Seton Hall Law Review, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 1182 1223; http://141.164.133.3/faculty/Block/Blockarticles/legalizationofblackmail.htm
Block, Walter. 1999. “Blackmailing for Mutual Good: A Reply to Russell Hardin,” Vermont Law Review, Vol. 24, No. 1, Fall, pp. 121-141; http://141.164.133.3/faculty/Block/Blockarticles/blackmailingformutualgood.htm
Block, Walter. 1999. “The Crime of Blackmail: A Libertarian Critique,” Criminal Justice Ethics, Vol. 18, No. 2, Summer/Fall, pp. 3-10; http://141.164.133.3/faculty/Block/Blockarticles/crimeofblackmail.htm;
http://www.walterblock.com/publications/crimeofblackmail.htm
Block, Walter. 1999. “Replies to Levin and Kipnis on Blackmail,” Criminal Justice Ethics, Vol. 18, No. 2, Summer/Fall, pp. 23-28; http://www.walterblock.com/publications/levin_kipnis.pdf;
Block, Walter. 1999. “Blackmail and Economic Analysis: Reply to Ginsburg and Shechtman,” Thomas Jefferson Law Review, Vol. 21, No. 2, October, pp. 165-192
Block, Walter and Robert W. McGee. 1999. “Blackmail as a Victimless Crime,” Bracton Law Journal, Vol. 31, pp. 24-48; http://141.164.133.3/faculty/Block/Blockarticles/blackmailvictimlesscrime.htm
Block, Walter and Robert W. McGee. 1999. “Blackmail from A to Z: A Reply to Joseph Isenbergh’s ‘Blackmail from A to C,’” Mercer Law Review, Vol. 50, No. 2, winter, pp. 569-601; http://www.walterblock.com/publications/blackmail_a_to_z.pdf
Block, Walter and Christopher E. Kent. 1999. “Blackmail,” Magill’s Legal Guide, Pasadena, CA: Salem Press, p. 109.
Block, Walter. 1998. “A Libertarian Theory of Blackmail: Reply to Leo Katz’s ‘Blackmail and Other Forms of Arm-Twisting,’” Irish Jurist, Vol. XXXIII, pp. 280-310; http://www.walterblock.com/publications/libertarian_theory.pdf
Block, Walter. 1997. “The Case for De-Criminalizing Blackmail: A Reply to Lindgren and Campbell,” Western State University Law Review, Vol. 24, No. 2, spring, pp. 225-246; http://141.164.133.3/faculty/Block/Blockarticles/blackmail.htm;
http://www.walterblock.com/publications/decrim_blackmail.pdf
Block, Walter. 1986. “Trading Money for Silence,” University of Hawaii Law Review, Vol. 8, No. 1, Spring, pp. 57-73; reprinted as Block, Walter. 1987. “Trading Money for Silence?” Economic Imperialism: The Economic Approach Applied Outside the Traditional Areas of Economics, Peter Bernholz and Gerard Radnitzky, eds., New York: Paragon House, pp. 157-218; http://141.164.133.3/faculty/Block/Blockarticles/tradingmoneyforsilence.htm
Block, Walter and David Gordon. 1985. “Blackmail, Extortion and Free Speech: A Reply to Posner, Epstein, Nozick and Lindgren,” Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, Vol. 19, No. 1, November, pp. 37-54; http://141.164.133.3/faculty/Block/Blockarticles/blackmail.htm
Block, Walter. 1973. “The Blackmailer as Hero: A Reply.” The Libertarian Forum. March, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 3-4; http://www.mises.org/journals/lf/1973/1973_03.pdf
Block, Walter. 1972. “The Blackmailer as Hero.” The Libertarian Forum. December, Vol. 4, No. 10, pp. 3-4; http://www.mises.org/journals/lf/1972/1972_12.pdf
1 comment:
"Imagine a league called the “decent eaters,” organized to espouse the doctrine that eating pie together with milk is evil (...) The attempt to prohibit pie and milk would evoke only laughter
but there would be a more tolerant attitude toward the attempt
to prohibit prostitution."
Hoje em dia, não tenho tanta certeza, sobretudo se a campanha anti-"tarte com leite" fosse feita com argumentos de saúde (estilo, "não comer ao mesmo tempo açucares com periodo de digestão diferente) em vez de moral.
Post a Comment